A recent Arabic article appearing in Egypt's Al Ahram newspaper
titled "Is Terrorism Jihad?" written by Islamic law expert Dr. Abdul
Fatah Idris offers important lessons-from the fact that jihad does
involve subjugating non-Muslims to why the Western mentality is still
incapable of acknowledging it.
Idris, professor and chairman of Al Azhar University's Department of Comparative Jurisprudence at the Faculty of Sharia Law, is a well-reputed legal scholar. He begins his article by defining terrorism and quoting several international bodies that, in his words:
Idris also mentions how "the
Islamic Research Academy, in its report issued on November 4th, 2001,
defines terrorism as terrorizing innocent people and the destruction of
their properties and their essential elements of living and attacking
their finances and their persons and their liberties and their human
dignity without right and spreading corruption throughout the land"
[emphasis added].
Note that, although he quotes from several international bodies, it is only the "Islamic Research Academy" that includes words like "innocent" and "without right," both of which clearly leave much wiggle room to exonerate terrorist acts committed against those perceived as not being "innocent" or who it is a right to terrorize, which according to many Muslims, includes the West.
Read more, here.
Idris, professor and chairman of Al Azhar University's Department of Comparative Jurisprudence at the Faculty of Sharia Law, is a well-reputed legal scholar. He begins his article by defining terrorism and quoting several international bodies that, in his words:
define
terrorism as an act of violence or threat of violence coming from an
individual either on his own volition or in participation with other
individuals. It targets people or organizations or places or means of
transportation or the general public in order to threaten or cause
injuries or deaths of the people or simply to cripple the effectiveness
of international organizations or to cause the loss or damage of those
places or properties or to tamper with transportation to interfere in
the friendly relations between countries or between the inhabitants of
several countries or to extort concessions from some countries.
The
conspiracy to commit or to intend to commit or to participate in the
committing or to incite the general public to commit the aforementioned
crimes constitutes the crime of international terrorism. The first
clause of the Geneva Convention which was adopted by Suppression of
Terrorism Conference held in Geneva in 1937 defines terrorism as a
criminal act directed against a specific nation with the aims of
creating a state of terror in the minds of specific people or a group of
people or the general public.
Note that, although he quotes from several international bodies, it is only the "Islamic Research Academy" that includes words like "innocent" and "without right," both of which clearly leave much wiggle room to exonerate terrorist acts committed against those perceived as not being "innocent" or who it is a right to terrorize, which according to many Muslims, includes the West.
Read more, here.
No comments:
Post a Comment