In the aftermath of the murder of 12 French journalists at the hand of Islamic 
terrorists, liberal leaders have revealed the extraordinary depth of their anti-conservative animus to 
the point of absurdity and beyond.
Consider the following statements, all of them made on Wednesday:
1) The Islamic terrorists are no different than Rev. Jerry Falwell!
Appearing on "Now with Alex Wagner" on MSNBC, Eric Bates, Executive Editor 
of First
 Look Media, said: "I think we also have to remember that this isn't 
just Islamic extremism. If you go back to the '80s – during the Reagan 
administration – when Jerry Falwell sued Hustler Magazine for portraying
 him having – I believe it was drunken incest with his mother in an 
outhouse – again, in a visual form – and won a $150,000 court case 
against Hustler for that. It was overturned by the Supreme Court, I 
think, eight-to-zero. So, you know, religious fundamentalists of all 
stripes and of nationalities have this penchant to say, we want to be 
able tell you what you can and can't portray."
Yes, the 
cold-blooded murder of satirical journalists in France is the same as 
Jerry Falwell taking Hustler Magazine to court. (And notice when 
Falwell's law suit took place: during the dark days of the evil Reagan!)
Aside
 from the monstrous absurdity of the comparison – countless thousands of
 civil-minded, freedom-loving, non-violent Americans take each other to 
court over various offenses and breeches – the incident with Rev. 
Falwell wasn't a matter of fundamentalist, religious censorship. It had 
to do with personal insult that went beyond the pale of propriety, which
 is why the court initially sided with Falwell.
Yet Bates has the temerity to appear on TV and make this charge. Extraordinary.
2) The Islamic terrorists are no more Muslims than Howard Dean is a Muslim (says Howard Dean himself!).
Appearing on "Morning Joe" with Joe Scarborough on MSNBC (are you 
seeing a pattern yet?), Democratic leader Howard Dean offered these sage
 remarks: "You know, this is a chronic problem. I stopped calling these 
people Muslim terrorists. They're about as Muslim as I am. I mean, they 
have no respect for anybody else's life, that's not what the Koran says.
 . . . I think ISIS is a cult. Not an Islamic cult. I think it's a cult.
 You have to treat these people as basically mass murderers. But I do 
not think we should accord them any particular religious respect, 
because I don't think, whatever they're claiming their motivation is, is
 clearly a twisted, cultish mind."
I wonder 
how many
 times Dean has read the Koran, let alone read it in Arabic. And I 
wonder what he does with the many verses in the Koran and Islamic 
tradition that sanction these murderous acts.
But
 according to Dean (and a host of others), the Islamic State is not 
Islam, Al-Qaeda is not Islam, Boko Haram is not Islam, Al-Shabaab is not
 Islam, and the Taliban do not represent Islam, nor do Hezbollah, Hamas,
 Islamic Jihad, and all the other groups that base their theology on the
 Koran, who murder for the glory of Allah and the honor of Mohammed, and
 who find precedent for their actions in the life and example of their 
revered prophet.
If he had said, "I don't believe that this is the
 best and truest expression of Islam," then he might have had an 
argument (although many would still reject his words). But to say that 
the Islamic State and their kin are not Islamic is like saying that 
Howard Dean is not a Democrat. (Note also that the Islamic State is led 
by a lifetime Muslim who reportedly has a Ph.D. in Islamic Studies.)
Continued, 
here.